Los sistemas participativos de garantía en el Ecuador. Aproximaciones a su desarrollo
Loading...
Date
Authors
Pino Andrade, Mauricio
relationships.isAuthorOf2
relationships.isAuthorOf3
relationships.isAuthorOf4
relationships.isAuthorOf6
relationships.isAuthorOf7
relationships.isAuthorOf8
relationships.isAuthorOf5
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Quito, Ecuador : Flacso Ecuador
item.qr.title
item.qr.description
Abstract
Description
Este trabajo estudia los Sistemas Participativos de Garantía (SPG) como esquemas de certificación alternativos a la Certificación de Tercera Parte (CTP). Estos se caracterizan por su abordaje multiactoral basado en los principios de participación, transparencia y confianza. Basándonos en la lógica de rastreo de procesos (process-tracing) y análisis comparativo, se analizaron las experiencias con SPG de Brasil, con Red Ecovida, y de Ecuador. Este trabajo muestra que la CTP creó una trayectoria normativa que resultó en su inclusión en la regulación de productos orgánicos, excluyendo a los sistemas distintos a la CTP de reconocimiento oficial.
This study examines Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative to Third Party Certification (TPC). These schemes are characterized by its multi-stakeholder approach which relies on principles like participation, transparency and trust. This research, based on the logics of process-tracing and comparative analysis, analyzed the experiences with PGS of the peasant’s network Red Ecovida from Brazil, and Ecuador’s experience. This study supports the idea that TPC created a normative trajectory that resulted in this scheme embedding the regulations on organics. Consequently, other systems than TPC are excluded from official recognition.
This study examines Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative to Third Party Certification (TPC). These schemes are characterized by its multi-stakeholder approach which relies on principles like participation, transparency and trust. This research, based on the logics of process-tracing and comparative analysis, analyzed the experiences with PGS of the peasant’s network Red Ecovida from Brazil, and Ecuador’s experience. This study supports the idea that TPC created a normative trajectory that resulted in this scheme embedding the regulations on organics. Consequently, other systems than TPC are excluded from official recognition.
item.page.notes
Keywords
AGROECOLOGÍA, CERTIFICACIÓN, GOBERNANZA ALIMENTARIA, SISTEMA PARTICIPATIVO DE GARANTÍA, PRODUCTO ORGÁNICO, ECUADOR
item.page.medium
item.page.tipo
Artículo
Date
2017-09
item.page.doi
item.page.other
item.page.isbn
item.page.ispartofseries
item.page.paginacion
p. 120-145
item.page.lugar
item.page.cita
Pino Andrade, Mauricio. 2017. Los sistemas participativos de garantía en el Ecuador. Aproximaciones a su desarrollo (Dossier) o Participatory Guarantee Systems in Ecuador. Approaches to its development. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales Flacso - Ecuador, 22:120-145.