Estudios estratégicos: entre la rigurosidad y la subjetividad
Loading...
Date
Authors
Salgado Espinoza, Raúl
Barreiro, Daniela
relationships.isAuthorOf2
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Quito, Ecuador : Flacso Ecuador : Relasedor
item.qr.title
item.qr.description
item.metrics.title
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX
Scopus
Abstract
Description
El presente artículo propone que los reducidos diálogos y debates entre los grupos académicos provenientes de las diferentes regiones y perspectivas han contribuido a la expansión ilimitada de las temáticas abarcadas por los estudios estratégicos. Desde una perspectiva metodológica y para desarrollar este argumento, este artículo hace un análisis descriptivo-analítico de la literatura sobre los estudios estratégicos desde tres diferentes encuadres: mundial, regional y nacional. El texto se desarrolla con la premisa fundamental de que la “estrategia” como objeto de estudio ha perdido su cualidad de concepto analítico a causa de su ampliación más allá de lo militar.
This paper proposes that the limited dialogue and debate amongst groups of academics from different regions and perspectives have contributed to the unlimited expansion of the strategic spectrum and the themes that cover strategic studies. From a methodological perspective and in order to develop this argument, this article provides a descriptive-analytical study of the literature of the field of strategic studies, from three different angles: worldwide, regional and national. The text develops with the fundamental premise that “strategy”, as object of study, has lost its original content as an analytical concept as a result of the broadening of its meaning.
This paper proposes that the limited dialogue and debate amongst groups of academics from different regions and perspectives have contributed to the unlimited expansion of the strategic spectrum and the themes that cover strategic studies. From a methodological perspective and in order to develop this argument, this article provides a descriptive-analytical study of the literature of the field of strategic studies, from three different angles: worldwide, regional and national. The text develops with the fundamental premise that “strategy”, as object of study, has lost its original content as an analytical concept as a result of the broadening of its meaning.
item.page.contenido
item.page.tipo
article
item.page.isbn
item.page.paginacion
p. 8-23
item.page.lugar
item.page.cita
Salgado Espinoza, Raúl y Daniela Barreiro. 2018. Estudios estratégicos: entre la rigurosidad y la subjetividad o Strategic studies: between rigour and subjectivity. Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, 22: 8-23.
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess