¿Analogía o identidad, ontología o ética entre la teoría del significante de J. Lacan y la teoría de la hegemonía de E. Laclau?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Barbosa, Sebastián
relationships.isAuthorOf2
relationships.isAuthorOf3
relationships.isAuthorOf4
relationships.isAuthorOf6
relationships.isAuthorOf7
relationships.isAuthorOf8
relationships.isAuthorOf5
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Maracaibo, Venezuela : Universidad del Zulia
item.qr.title
item.qr.description
item.metrics.title
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX
Scopus
Abstract
Description
El trabajo presenta para su discusión ciertos desarrollos de la teoría lacaniana en función de explicitar las formas en que la “teoría de la hegemonía” de Ernesto Laclau ha tendido a recuperar nociones centrales de ésta para el campo del análisis político y social. En ese marco, se desagregan una serie de nociones del “sistema de pensamiento lacaniano” para poder discutir la hipótesis “isomorfista” desarrollada por la teoría política del discurso, según la cual, no se trataría de aplicar simplemente conceptos psicoanalíticos sobre el campo social y político, sino que, existiría un isomorfismo entre el psicoanálisis y el campo social-político que permitiría plantear la relación entre psicoanálisis y Ciencias Sociales en un nivel de identidad y no simplemente de analogía. La centralidad de esta conjetura de partida reside en que la misma invita a pensar las tensiones y las vetas que constituyen su horizonte de sentido. Esa línea de análisis sitúa al conjunto de argumentaciones posibles y a las radiaciones de este supuesto hacia una serie de desarrollos teóricos en el seno mismo de la teoría social y política que problematizan y nutren la teoría produciendo un corrimiento conceptual de la relación entre Psicoanálisis y Ciencias Sociales desde relaciones analógicas, relaciones ontológicas, hasta llegar a una relación ética.
This paper introduces the discussion of certain developments of Lacanian theory in order to explain the ways in which Ernesto Laclau’s theory of hegemony has tended to restore central notions of it in the field of social and political analysis. In this context, a number of ideas from the “Lacanian thought system” are broken down to discuss the “isomorphist” hypothesis developed by the political theory of discourse, according to which, it would be not about simply applying psychoanalytic concepts to social and political fields, but accepting that an isomorphism exists between psychoanalysis and the social-political fields that would make it possible to outline the relationship between psychoanalysis and social sciences on a level of identity, not merely analogy. The centrality of this hypothesis is that it invites one to think about the tensions and lines of convergence that constitute the horizon of meaning. This analysis places the set of possible arguments and the radiations of this supposition toward a series of theoretical developments in the very heart of social and political theory that problematizes and nourishes the theory, producing a conceptual shift in the relationship between psychoanalysis and the social sciences, through analogical and ontological relations until reaching an ethical relationship.
This paper introduces the discussion of certain developments of Lacanian theory in order to explain the ways in which Ernesto Laclau’s theory of hegemony has tended to restore central notions of it in the field of social and political analysis. In this context, a number of ideas from the “Lacanian thought system” are broken down to discuss the “isomorphist” hypothesis developed by the political theory of discourse, according to which, it would be not about simply applying psychoanalytic concepts to social and political fields, but accepting that an isomorphism exists between psychoanalysis and the social-political fields that would make it possible to outline the relationship between psychoanalysis and social sciences on a level of identity, not merely analogy. The centrality of this hypothesis is that it invites one to think about the tensions and lines of convergence that constitute the horizon of meaning. This analysis places the set of possible arguments and the radiations of this supposition toward a series of theoretical developments in the very heart of social and political theory that problematizes and nourishes the theory, producing a conceptual shift in the relationship between psychoanalysis and the social sciences, through analogical and ontological relations until reaching an ethical relationship.
item.page.notes
item.page.medium
item.page.tipo
Artículo
Date
2014-03
item.page.doi
item.page.isbn
item.page.ispartofseries
item.page.paginacion
p. 115-124
item.page.lugar
item.page.cita
Barbosa, Sebastián. 2014. ¿Analogía o identidad, ontología o ética entre la teoría del significante de J. Lacan y la teoría de la hegemonía de E. Laclau? (Notas y debates de actualidad) = Analogy or Identity, Ontology or Ethics between the Theory of the Signifier by J. Lacan and the Theory of Hegemony by E. Laclau? Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, 19(64):115-124.