¿La geoingeniería es el “mal menor”?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Gardiner, Stephen M.
relationships.isAuthorOf2
relationships.isAuthorOf3
relationships.isAuthorOf4
relationships.isAuthorOf6
relationships.isAuthorOf7
relationships.isAuthorOf8
relationships.isAuthorOf5
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
México D. F., México : CIECAS – IPN
item.qr.title
item.qr.description
item.metrics.title
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX
Scopus
Abstract
Description
Polemizando con la posición del Premio Nobel Paul Crutzen, que define la tendencia del cambio climático reduciendo su futuro a la encrucijada catástrofe ambiental o la geoingeniería como ajuste tecnológico, este ensayo, elaborado por uno de los más destacados representantes estadounidenses de la ética ambiental, demuestra que ese planteamiento, además de no explorar los potenciales efectos negativos de la geoingeniería, esquiva el compromiso histórico-ético de prevenir los impactos más nocivos del cambio climático. Compromiso que exige asumir reducir las emisiones de gases invernadero, financiar programas anti-calentamiento global y re-estructurar las instituciones internacionales para asumir el cambio climático con políticas estratégicas basadas en el bien humano.
Arguing with the position of Nobel Prize Paul Crutzen, whom defines the trend of climate change by reducing of its future to the crossroads environmental catastrophe or geoengineering as techno-fix, this essay, written by one of the most prominent American representatives of environmental ethics, prove that this approach, in addition to not explore the potential negative effects of geoengineering, avoid historical-ethical commitment to prevent adverse impacts of climate change. Commitment that is required take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to finance anti-global warming programs and to restructure international institutions to design strategic policies about climate change with human good as foundation.
Arguing with the position of Nobel Prize Paul Crutzen, whom defines the trend of climate change by reducing of its future to the crossroads environmental catastrophe or geoengineering as techno-fix, this essay, written by one of the most prominent American representatives of environmental ethics, prove that this approach, in addition to not explore the potential negative effects of geoengineering, avoid historical-ethical commitment to prevent adverse impacts of climate change. Commitment that is required take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to finance anti-global warming programs and to restructure international institutions to design strategic policies about climate change with human good as foundation.
item.page.notes
item.page.contenido
item.page.medium
item.page.tipo
Artículo
Date
2010-12
item.page.isbn
item.page.ispartofseries
item.page.paginacion
p. 19-22
item.page.lugar
item.page.cita
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2010. ¿La geoingeniería es el “mal menor”? (Fundamentos y Debate). Mundo Siglo XXI. Revista del Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Administrativas y Sociales del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 23: 19-22.