El deber ético de las naciones para reducir la amenaza del cambio climático
Loading...
Date
Authors
Brown, Donald A.
relationships.isAuthorOf3
relationships.isAuthorOf4
relationships.isAuthorOf2
relationships.isAuthorOf6
relationships.isAuthorOf7
relationships.isAuthorOf8
relationships.isAuthorOf5
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
México D. F., México : CIECAS – IPN
item.qr.title
item.qr.description
Abstract
Description
Presentando la posición de uno de los más serios ponentes de la ética ambiental en la Administración Clinton, este ensayo cuestiona el rechazo economicista a la asunción de políticas estratégicas ante el cambio climático en EU mostrando que la formulación de que traerán consigo daño al empleo y al crecimiento económico proviene de campañas y estudios financiados por las corporaciones de combustibles fósiles. Asume que, en la era de la globalización, un problema de impactos potencialmente catastróficos como el cambio climático, no podrá ser enfrentado seriamente si no se rebasan las perspectivas locales, nacionales y regionales desde un mirador global que debe venir de la ética ambiental en el siglo XXI. Desde aquí este ensayo constata la importante polarización de posiciones ante el cambio climático que empieza a desarrollarse en EU.
Projecting the position of one of the most serious presenters of environmental ethics in the Clinton Administration, this essay questions the economicist reject to strategic policies about climate change in the U.S. showing that the formulation that will bring harms to employment and economic growth comes from campaigns and studies financed by fossil fuel corporations. Assume that, in the era of globalization, a problem of potentially catastrophic impacts like climate change can not be addressed seriously if the local, national and regional perspectives are not overtaken from a global viewpoint that must come from environmental ethics in XXI century. From here, this essay confirms the significant polarization of positions about climate change that begins to develop in the U.S.
Projecting the position of one of the most serious presenters of environmental ethics in the Clinton Administration, this essay questions the economicist reject to strategic policies about climate change in the U.S. showing that the formulation that will bring harms to employment and economic growth comes from campaigns and studies financed by fossil fuel corporations. Assume that, in the era of globalization, a problem of potentially catastrophic impacts like climate change can not be addressed seriously if the local, national and regional perspectives are not overtaken from a global viewpoint that must come from environmental ethics in XXI century. From here, this essay confirms the significant polarization of positions about climate change that begins to develop in the U.S.
item.page.notes
Keywords
ÉTICA AMBIENTAL, CALENTAMIENTO GLOBAL, CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO
item.page.medium
item.page.tipo
Artículo
Date
item.page.doi
item.page.other
item.page.isbn
item.page.ispartofseries
item.page.paginacion
p. 11-14
item.page.lugar
item.page.cita
Brown, Donald A. 2010. El deber ético de las naciones para reducir la amenaza del cambio climático (Fundamentos y Debate). Mundo Siglo XXI. Revista del Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Administrativas y Sociales del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 23: 11-14.