"La hermanita menor" : concepciones dominantes sobre la seguridad social no contributiva en expedientes judiciales (artículos)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Arcidiácono, Pilar
relationships.isAuthorOf3
relationships.isAuthorOf4
relationships.isAuthorOf2
relationships.isAuthorOf6
relationships.isAuthorOf7
relationships.isAuthorOf8
relationships.isAuthorOf5
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Buenos Aires : FLACSO. Sede Académica Argentina.
item.qr.title
item.qr.description
Abstract
Description
Este artículo de investigación analiza casos judiciales sobre pensiones no contributivas
que llegaron a captar la atención de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Presenta un conjunto de concepciones dominantes sobre estas prestaciones que están presentes en el entramado de actores que dan forma a los expedientes judiciales (principalmente demandantes, burocracias judiciales y del Poder Ejecutivo). La indagación se realizó sobre aspectos materiales de la producción del saber burocrático (los expedientes judiciales). Este tipo de abordaje toma distancia de los
frecuentes análisis sobre “la sentencia” como momento central en la creación del derecho. Añadir una visión multiactoral y etapista permite identificar diferentes “emisores” que detentan capital jurídico, redefinen y recodifican derechos y desigualdades. ¿De qué manera los temas “no contributivos” son abordados en los
expedientes judiciales? ¿Cuáles son las concepciones dominantes sobre las prestaciones y los principios que justifican (o no) restricciones en el acceso?
This article analyzes judicial cases on noncontributory pensions that came to capture the attention of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. It presents a set of dominant conceptions about these benefits that are present in the network of stakeholder that shape judicial files (plaintiffs, judicial bureaucracies and the executive branch). The inquiry was conducted on material aspects of the production of bureaucratic knowledge (judicial files). This type of approach takes distance from the frequent analysis on “the sentence” as the central moment in the creation of the right. Adding a multi-stakeholder vision and staging allows identifying different “issuers” that hold legal capital, redefine and recode rights and inequalities. How do judicial records incorporate “non-contributory” issues? What are the dominant conceptions of benefits and the principles that justify (or not) restrictions on access?
This article analyzes judicial cases on noncontributory pensions that came to capture the attention of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. It presents a set of dominant conceptions about these benefits that are present in the network of stakeholder that shape judicial files (plaintiffs, judicial bureaucracies and the executive branch). The inquiry was conducted on material aspects of the production of bureaucratic knowledge (judicial files). This type of approach takes distance from the frequent analysis on “the sentence” as the central moment in the creation of the right. Adding a multi-stakeholder vision and staging allows identifying different “issuers” that hold legal capital, redefine and recode rights and inequalities. How do judicial records incorporate “non-contributory” issues? What are the dominant conceptions of benefits and the principles that justify (or not) restrictions on access?
item.page.notes
Keywords
SEGURIDAD SOCIAL, PENSIONES, SENTENCIA JUDICIAL, ESTUDIOS DE CASOS, ASPECTOS JURÍDICOS, ARGENTINA
item.page.medium
item.page.tipo
Artículo
Date
item.page.doi
item.page.other
item.page.isbn
item.page.ispartofseries
item.page.paginacion
pp. 149-164
item.page.lugar
item.page.cita
Arcidiácono, Pilar. 2019. "La hermanita menor" : concepciones dominantes sobre la seguridad social no contributiva en expedientes judiciales (artículos). Revista Estado y Políticas Públicas, 7 (12): 149-164.
item.page.extent
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as openAccess